Featured Image Credit: Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images for Creators Inc./Instagram/@sophieraiin
Adam22 has called out an OnlyFans star who claimed that her top fan spent $4.7 million on her in less than a year alleging that she's faking the numbers.
The OnlyFans content creator took to X, formerly Twitter, to thank her top spender after they spent millions of dollars on the star.
Now, another creator is calling her out by alleging that she is not telling the full truth.
Yesterday (December 3), Sophie Rain posted screenshots of her earnings from one follower on the social media platform.
Advert
In the caption, she wrote: “Big thank you to my top spender for being there since the beginning.”
The photos revealed that the top fan had shockingly spent $84 on a subscription, $278,435.23 on messages and a whopping $4,445,405.86 on tips.
This totals up to an enormous $4,723,925.09 that the fan has spent on Sophie.
However, another content creator Adam22, whose real name is Adam Grandmaison, has hit back at the OnlyFans star.
Writing a tweet in response, Adam claimed: “Everyone I’ve talked to who works in the Onlyfans industry agrees these numbers are fake and would kindly request you post screen recordings.”
The podcaster went on to say: “I’m not “mad” I just think y’all should know this is marketing and not news. Yea she’s very popular but her management team are faking her numbers to get media attention (and it’s working).”
But Sophie wasn’t ready to back down and fired back with a screen recording of her total earnings.
She wrote ‘happy now’ with crying emojis.
In the screenshot, her total earnings appeared as a whopping $43,505,866.99.
Many X users shared their own reactions to the interaction, with many taking to the comment section to give their thoughts.
One user wrote: “Brokies will never be happy.”
Another joked: “I still don’t believe this! Send me a 15 bands so I know you’re serious.”
And a third person commented: “Damn haters out there 4 real . Congratulations.”
However, not everyone was convinced by the screen recording and others took to X to share their theories on it.
One user said: “If there's no page refreshing in a screen recording, it means nothing.”
Another wrote: “Do it on a chrome, record the full screen and reload the page when you’re recording.”
And a third user added: “This doesn't prove anything. It's literally the easiest thing to fake this. all you have to do is right click on the website and change the numbers in the code.”
