uniladtech homepage
  • News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Family blames Elon Musk in lawsuit after their son was crushed to death driving Tesla
Home>Vehicles>Car news
Published 12:56 9 Dec 2024 GMT

Family blames Elon Musk in lawsuit after their son was crushed to death driving Tesla

They argue that Musk misled people about Tesla's self-driving abilities

Rikki Loftus

Rikki Loftus

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Contra Costa County Fire Protection District/PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Tesla
Elon Musk
Car news
Vehicles

Advert

Advert

Advert

A family has blamed Elon Musk in a lawsuit after their son was crushed to death while driving a Tesla.

The man from California died in a crash while his vehicle was in ‘autopilot’ mode.

Genesis Giovanni Mendoza Martinez had reportedly bought the Tesla Model S after mistakenly thinking it was self-driving.

The family of the man killed in the crash are suing Tesla (Contra Costa County Fire Protection District)
The family of the man killed in the crash are suing Tesla (Contra Costa County Fire Protection District)

Advert

This is according to a lawsuit that has been filed by his family.

They are suing Tesla after claims were made by the firm and its CEO Elon Musk that the self-driving capabilities had been perfected.

The firm has argued that its vehicles have ‘a reasonably safe design as measured by the appropriate test under the applicable state law’ and the incident ‘may have been caused in whole or in part’ by Mendoza Martinez’s ‘own negligent acts and/or omissions’.

In a response to the lawsuit, Tesla said: “No additional warnings would have, or could have prevented the alleged incident, the injuries, losses and damages alleged.”

Speaking to The Independent, attorney Brett Schreiber, who is representing the family, said: “This is yet another example of Tesla using our public roadways to perform research and development of its autonomous driving technology. The injuries suffered by the first responders and the death of Mr. Mendoza were entirely preventable.

“What’s worse is that Tesla knows that many of its earlier model vehicles continue to drive our roadways today with this same defect putting first responders and the public at risk.”

The crash took place on February 18, 2023, where Mendoza Martinez’s brother, Caleb, was also severely injured.

The man had been driving a Tesla in 'autopilot' when it crashed (PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
The man had been driving a Tesla in 'autopilot' when it crashed (PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Speaking about Tesla’s ‘autopilot feature’, the attorney went on to add: “It’s this rush of pushing product out that is not really ready for primetime.”

In the lawsuit, it claims: “Not only was he aware that the technology itself was called ‘Autopilot,’ he saw, heard, and/or read many of Tesla or Musk’s deceptive claims on Twitter, Tesla’s official blog, or in the news media.

“Giovanni believed those claims were true, and thus believed the ‘Autopilot’ feature with the ‘full self driving’ upgrade was safer than a human driver, and could be trusted to safely navigate public highways autonomously.”

The complaint accuses Tesla of training employees to ‘refrain from memorializing customer reports in writing’.

It states: “When Tesla employees did respond to customer reports in writing, it was only to reassure customers that the ‘Autopilot’ feature was working as intended.

“In addition, Tesla… forced consumers to sign nondisclosure agreements to receive repairs under warranty.”

The complaint went on to say: “Predictably, this has led — and will continue to lead — to multiple collisions between Teslas and other vehicles or pedestrians, resulting in death or serious bodily injury.”

Tesla responded in a court filing in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, where it argued that the ‘damages and injuries’ suffered by Mendoza Martinez and Caleb, ‘if any, were caused by misuse or improper maintenance of the subject product in a manner not reasonably foreseeable to Tesla’.

LADbible Group has contacted Tesla for a comment.

Choose your content:

17 hours ago
4 days ago
6 days ago
  • Boarding1Now / Getty
    17 hours ago

    United Airlines flight forced to make emergency U-turn due to device carried by millions on planes everyday

    This might make you think twice about the naming process

    Vehicles
  • Catherine Falls Commercial/Getty Images
    4 days ago

    Millions of weight loss jab users could be unknowingly breaking serious driving laws

    The DMV has strict rules around driving on certain medication

    Vehicles
  • Tatsiana Volkava via Getty
    6 days ago

    Plane carrying 180 passengers forced to divert after common gadget found in luggage

    It's time to revisit the various airline rules on what is and isn't allowed in the hold

    Vehicles
  • Brandon Bell / Staff / Getty
    6 days ago

    Elon Musk’s futuristic rocket ‘could fly passengers from London to Hong Kong in 34 minutes’

    Musk has claimed that the dream is 'now possible'

    Vehicles
  • TV presenter blames Elon Musk's Tesla for speeding as he's banned from driving for six months
  • Family sues Elon Musk's Tesla after claims the doors on Cybertruck led to daughter's death
  • Tesla accused of pumping shocking amount of 'black liquid' from $1 billion lithium refinery every second
  • Elon Musk's billionaire rival calls out Tesla after self-driving vehicle slams into child-sized mannequin