• News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Family blames Elon Musk in lawsuit after their son was crushed to death driving Tesla

Home> Vehicles> Car news

Published 12:56 9 Dec 2024 GMT

Family blames Elon Musk in lawsuit after their son was crushed to death driving Tesla

They argue that Musk misled people about Tesla's self-driving abilities

Rikki Loftus

Rikki Loftus

A family has blamed Elon Musk in a lawsuit after their son was crushed to death while driving a Tesla.

The man from California died in a crash while his vehicle was in ‘autopilot’ mode.

Genesis Giovanni Mendoza Martinez had reportedly bought the Tesla Model S after mistakenly thinking it was self-driving.

Advert

The family of the man killed in the crash are suing Tesla (Contra Costa County Fire Protection District)
The family of the man killed in the crash are suing Tesla (Contra Costa County Fire Protection District)

This is according to a lawsuit that has been filed by his family.

They are suing Tesla after claims were made by the firm and its CEO Elon Musk that the self-driving capabilities had been perfected.

The firm has argued that its vehicles have ‘a reasonably safe design as measured by the appropriate test under the applicable state law’ and the incident ‘may have been caused in whole or in part’ by Mendoza Martinez’s ‘own negligent acts and/or omissions’.

Advert

In a response to the lawsuit, Tesla said: “No additional warnings would have, or could have prevented the alleged incident, the injuries, losses and damages alleged.”

Speaking to The Independent, attorney Brett Schreiber, who is representing the family, said: “This is yet another example of Tesla using our public roadways to perform research and development of its autonomous driving technology. The injuries suffered by the first responders and the death of Mr. Mendoza were entirely preventable.

“What’s worse is that Tesla knows that many of its earlier model vehicles continue to drive our roadways today with this same defect putting first responders and the public at risk.”

The crash took place on February 18, 2023, where Mendoza Martinez’s brother, Caleb, was also severely injured.

Advert

The man had been driving a Tesla in 'autopilot' when it crashed (PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
The man had been driving a Tesla in 'autopilot' when it crashed (PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Speaking about Tesla’s ‘autopilot feature’, the attorney went on to add: “It’s this rush of pushing product out that is not really ready for primetime.”

In the lawsuit, it claims: “Not only was he aware that the technology itself was called ‘Autopilot,’ he saw, heard, and/or read many of Tesla or Musk’s deceptive claims on Twitter, Tesla’s official blog, or in the news media.

“Giovanni believed those claims were true, and thus believed the ‘Autopilot’ feature with the ‘full self driving’ upgrade was safer than a human driver, and could be trusted to safely navigate public highways autonomously.”

Advert

The complaint accuses Tesla of training employees to ‘refrain from memorializing customer reports in writing’.

It states: “When Tesla employees did respond to customer reports in writing, it was only to reassure customers that the ‘Autopilot’ feature was working as intended.

“In addition, Tesla… forced consumers to sign nondisclosure agreements to receive repairs under warranty.”

The complaint went on to say: “Predictably, this has led — and will continue to lead — to multiple collisions between Teslas and other vehicles or pedestrians, resulting in death or serious bodily injury.”

Advert

Tesla responded in a court filing in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, where it argued that the ‘damages and injuries’ suffered by Mendoza Martinez and Caleb, ‘if any, were caused by misuse or improper maintenance of the subject product in a manner not reasonably foreseeable to Tesla’.

LADbible Group has contacted Tesla for a comment.

Featured Image Credit: Contra Costa County Fire Protection District/PATRICK PLEUL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
Tesla
Elon Musk
Car news
Vehicles

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

5 hours ago
8 hours ago
3 days ago
7 days ago
  • 5 hours ago

    Man convicted after traveling on 120 flights for free by posing as a flight attendant

    The man has since been convicted of wire fraud

    Vehicles
  • 8 hours ago

    Experts officially reveal the number one safest airline in the world

    It has been revealed which are the safest full-service and low-cost airlines

    Vehicles
  • 3 days ago

    TSA approves new form of ID for iPhone users but only for certain journeys

    This new change could save you time in the stress of an airport

    Vehicles
  • 7 days ago

    Drone spots possible glimpse of ground-breaking new Tesla model on test track

    Potentially a new prototype.

    Vehicles
  • Drone spots possible glimpse of ground-breaking new Tesla model on test track
  • Tesla driver shares terrifying dashcam footage of crash in Tesla just moments after unknowingly FSD disengages
  • Elon Musk speaks out about Tesla Pi phone that could rival the iPhone
  • Elon Musk threatens to sue Canada after Tesla was caught out for 'suspicious' behaviour