• News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Controversial experiment to dim the Sun expected to be approved within weeks

Home> Science> News

Published 10:44 25 Apr 2025 GMT+1

Controversial experiment to dim the Sun expected to be approved within weeks

Scientists argue this could be the key to slowing climate change

Harry Boulton

Harry Boulton

Controversial experiments intended to block out or dim the Sun known as 'geoengineering' are expected to be approved within weeks by a UK government agency, and it could be the key to slowing down global warming.

Climate change is one of the biggest problems facing our planet as a collective right now, and scientists have repeatedly warned that 'irreversible' damage is occurring with seemingly no plans to properly combat it.

Terrifying projections of what Earth could look like in the future if global warming continues as it is right now are likely to shake you to your core, and with yearly carbon limits breached by the richest 1% in just a few days, it can leave you wondering what options are left.

One potential solution though is geoengineering, as while highly debated and controversial, it could successfully slow down the effects of global warming, giving much-needed time to tackle other key measures.

Advert

As reported by The Guardian, geoengineering is a process that aims to artificially block out and dim sunlight from reaching Earth's surface, which would in turn curb rising temperatures.

Geoengineering and solar radiation management use aerosol particles to reflect sunlight away from the Earth (NASEM)
Geoengineering and solar radiation management use aerosol particles to reflect sunlight away from the Earth (NASEM)

It does this by releasing aerosol particles into the air above the clouds which reflect light from the Sun back into space, and it also uses separate particles to make clouds brighter, increasing their reflectivity in addition.

Plans to begin experimenting with these solar radiation management (SRM) techniques is expected to be approved by the UK's Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria) in a £50 million ($66.5 million) program, which will then assess the viability of the process through the collection of critical data.

Advert

Scientists backing the plan emphasize its urgency by highlighting the climate 'tipping points' - such as the collapse of ocean currents and giant ice sheets - that it could delay by lowering global temperatures.

However, SRM approaches have their fair share of opposition who typically highlight two key areas to prove that geoengineering plans aren't as efficient or viable as you might think.

First and foremost, there is a worry that geoengineering could have dangerously unintended consequences on the environment, as tampering with the atmosphere, clouds, and sunlight could alter rainfall which is vital to food production.

Additionally, many scientists have argued that SRM only obscures the true culprit of climate change worldwide, which is the burning of fossil fuels. Private jets from one of the world's richest individuals pump out 207 years worth of pollution in just 12 months, for example, so acting like SRM will solve the issue while these harmful actions continue is disingenuous.

Advert

Critics of SRM techniques point towards fossil fuels as the biggest contributor of global warming (Getty Stock)
Critics of SRM techniques point towards fossil fuels as the biggest contributor of global warming (Getty Stock)

Some have even compared geoengineering efforts to using aspirin to cure cancer, although that has actually been suggested by one study in what's considered to be a 'eureka moment'.

Dr. Pete Irvine at the University of Chicago has outlined that "it's worth stressing that geoengineering is not a substitute for emission cuts," but it still could prove to be a worthwhile effort to slow down the effects, so long as the main causes are also addressed.

With rising power demands for artificial intelligence production though, including allegedly illegal measures in some cases, it's hard to see a situation in the next few years where demand for global power decreases, even with the efforts of countries like China to achieve carbon neutrality.

Featured Image Credit: coldsnowstorm via Getty
Climate change
Science
Earth
Sun

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

4 hours ago
2 days ago
4 days ago
6 days ago
  • ABC
    4 hours ago

    Doctor reveals what really happens to your body when you go under anesthesia

    It's some people's biggest fear

    Science
  • Katarzyna Ledwon-Zarzycka / Getty
    2 days ago

    Scientists create world's first ever 'time crystal' that could end up on $100 bills

    It could be used as an anti-counterfeit measure

    Science
  • Bill Turnbull/NY Daily News Archive via Getty Images
    4 days ago

    Experts reveal heartbreaking reason thousands of victims of 9/11 have still not been identified

    Almost half of the remains are still not identified to this day

    Science
  • NASA video / YouTube
    6 days ago

    NASA confirms Mars rover has discovered the strongest evidence of 'ancient life' yet

    Could this be aliens?

    Science
  • Controversial Bill Gates-backed plan blocks out the sun to reverse global warming
  • World's largest battery made completely from sand could change the clean energy industry forever
  • Researcher reveals controversial plan to detonate a nuclear bomb at the bottom of the ocean to save the world
  • New research reveals chilling glimpse into how Earth will come to an end