Featured Image Credit: Andrew Harnik/Getty Images
President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice has been left mortified after the public has realized they can easily un-redact top secret Epstein files.
This comes after the long-awaited release of the files came heavily redacted.
However, many have since discovered that this can be undone as cybersecurity expert, Chad Loder, shared how he was able to lift the redactions from portions of the documents.
Taking to social media, he posted some insight into how he did it, writing on Bluesky: “I wanted to figure out what changed between the DOJ's initial Epstein Files Vol. 8 document dump (which they quickly pulled) and the version they replaced it with. I had a few hours of free time for PDF forensics hacking today.
Advert
“The short annoying version is, DOJ's eDiscovery/FOIA production pipeline assigns Bates numbers (or something like Bates) to each page of a produced PDF. They do the number sequences at publish time and "burn" them into the PDFs. The system applies changes in versioned "layers" so I removed them.
“There's really nefarious about the DOJ's production pipeline or document numbering. These are fairly common complications one runs into when dealing with large FOIA or eDiscovery dumps. I had to normalize the docs and compare them with the automatic Bates numbers stripped out of the analysis.”
Many people took to the comment section to share their own reactions to the post, with many posing more questions to the developer, as one user wrote: “As a layperson, I'm just struck by the 40-to 60% redactions on the various sample pages. I've seen the examples with whole pages. From what you've analyzed, does that hold throughout the entire release?”
Another said: “Beyond the visual redactions, did you notice meaningful metadata/object structure differences that suggest the second upload was “sanitized” for hidden layers or recoverable content?”
A third person commented: “Investigate. Let Congress grill them all.”
And a fourth added: “Your insight about the IDs is interesting, that means that if early versions come out (or late versions, or different versions) the feds can probably locate who ran the pipeline and get them.”
Redacted parts of the documents reveal how Epstein paid money to witnesses to cover his tracks as well as threatening harm to his victims and releasing ‘damaging stories about them to damage their credibility when they tried to go public with their stories of being trafficked and sexually abused’.
Epstein also told ‘participant-witnesses to destroy evidence relevant to ongoing court proceedings involving Defendants’ criminal sex trafficking and abuse conduct’.
