uniladtech homepage
  • News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Google's AI chat bot wiped $100 billion off company's value after answering question wrong
Home>News>AI
Updated 15:17 15 Nov 2023 GMTPublished 07:53 14 Nov 2023 GMT

Google's AI chat bot wiped $100 billion off company's value after answering question wrong

This is one costly mistake...

Mia Williams

Mia Williams

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Smith Collection/Gado / Contributor/Yuichiro Chino
AI
Google
Twitter
Gadgets

Advert

Advert

Advert

The mishap in Google’s new AI service has cost the company billions of dollars…ouch!

Google was showing off its new fancy AI service - named Bard - on Twitter with a little demonstration of how it works.

But a factual blunder saw the company’s value shoot down…someone’s got some explaining to do!

The AI service presented incorrect information as a fact.
Google

Advert

The post explained: “Bard is an experimental conversational AI service, powered by LaMDA.

“Built using our large language models and drawing on information from the web, it’s a launchpad for curiosity and can help simplify complex topics.”

You can see the service in action - and getting it wrong - here:

It also shared a gif, which showed someone asking Bard: “What new discoveries from the James Webb Space Telescope can I tell my 9-year-old about?”

Which prompted several responses from the AI service, including: “In 2023, the JWST spotted a number of galaxies nicknamed ‘green peas’.

“They were given this name because they are small, round, and green, like peas.”

And the fact that the telescope also captured images of galaxies that are 'over 13 billion years old.’

However, the last item on the short list was factually inaccurate, seemingly showing a flaw with the AI’s capabilities.

The ‘fact’ read: “JWSR took the very pictures of a planet outside of our own solar system. These distant worlds are called ‘exoplanets’.

“Exo means ‘from outside.’”

We’re not quite sure that’s totally accurate…!

Getty/ rbkomar

Because according to NASA, the first image taken of a planet outside of our own solar system was actually snapped back in 2004 by the, wonderfully named, European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope.

As you can imagine, the mistake didn’t go unnoticed by Twitter users, with Grant Tremblay from the Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics writing: “I’m sure Bard will be impressive, but for the record: JWST did not take ‘the very first image of a planet outside our solar system’.

“The first image was instead done by Chauvin et al. (2004) with the VLT/NACO using adaptive optics.”

Bruce Macintosh, the director of the University of California Observatories and part of the team that took the first images of exoplanets, also spotted the mistake.

In a post, he wrote: “Speaking as someone who imaged an exoplanet 14 years before JWST was launched, it feels like you should find a better example?”

Shortly after the tweet was posted, Google’s parent company Alphabet saw its share price fall around eight percent - knocking off around $100 billion (£82,466,000,000) off its market value, according to Forbes.

A spokesperson from Google told the outlet: “This highlights the importance of a rigorous testing process, something that we’re kicking off this week.”

Better late than never, I guess.

Choose your content:

13 hours ago
14 hours ago
15 hours ago
  • Patricio Nahuelhual / Getty
    13 hours ago

    Exactly what happens to your body when you eat heavily burnt food as cancer researcher warns against consuming

    Charring your meals can actually have an unexpected consequence

    Science
  • Chesnot/Getty Images
    14 hours ago

    Jeff Bezos slams Washington Post business staff as 'terrible' in new report

    Jeff Bezos bought the newspaper back in 2013

    News
  • Bloomberg / Contributor / Getty
    15 hours ago

    Crypto billionaire warns AI is about to trigger a $527B banking collapse 'bigger than 2008'

    Investment into AI is causing prominent cryptocurrencies to crumble under pressure

    News
  • Anna Moneymaker / Staff / Getty
    15 hours ago

    OpenAI's confidential financials leak to show $21,000,000,000 in losses

    The tech giant's total expenses climbed from $12.48 billion in 2024 to $34 billion in 2025

    News
  • Google's AI chat bot wiped $100,000,000,000 off company's value after answering this question wrong
  • People fear 'the end is near' as Google's new Gemini AI model is set to change everything
  • Google's top AI developer makes alarming prediction for the next six months of artificial intelligence
  • CNN is suing a multi-billion dollar AI startup and the company's defense is just five words long