uniladtech homepage
  • News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Archive
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Trees absorbed almost no CO2 last year and scientists have no idea why

Home> Science> News

Published 12:06 5 Nov 2024 GMT

Trees absorbed almost no CO2 last year and scientists have no idea why

Scientists don't know what this will mean for the planet

Rikki Loftus

Rikki Loftus

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: MICHAEL WORKMAN/Jasmin Merdan/Getty Images
Climate change
Science
News

Advert

Advert

Advert

As the Earth continues to heat up, scientists are getting increasingly worried about the state of our planet.

And it looks like things could be taking a turn for the worse after it was discovered that trees absorbed almost no CO2 last year.

However, experts have no idea why.

Scientists don't know why trees aren't absorbing carbon (Kevin Skipworth / 500px/Getty Images)
Scientists don't know why trees aren't absorbing carbon (Kevin Skipworth / 500px/Getty Images)

Advert

In 2023, which was also the hottest year on record, our forests, plants and soil absorbed almost no carbon.

Philippe Ciais, who is a researcher at the French Laboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences, said: “In 2023 the accumulation of CO2 in the atmosphere is very high and this translates into a very, very low absorption by the terrestrial biosphere.

“In the northern hemisphere, where you have more than half of CO2 uptake, we have seen a decline trend in absorption for eight years.

“There is no good reason to believe it will bounce back.”

This is particularly concerning as it hasn’t been predicted to happen by scientists, who are now having to rethink their models for gauging climate change.

Professor Andrew Watson, who is the head of Exeter University’s marine and atmospheric science group, added: “Overall, models agreed that both the land sink and the ocean sink are going to decrease in the future as a result of climate change. But there’s a question of how quickly that will happen.

Our planet's temperature continues to rise (DrPixel/Getty Images)
Our planet's temperature continues to rise (DrPixel/Getty Images)

The models tend to show this happening rather slowly over the next 100 years or so. This might happen a lot quicker.

“Climate scientists [are] worried about climate change not because of the things that are in the models but the knowledge that the models are missing certain things.”

Ciais went on to say: “None of these models have factored in losses like extreme factors which have been observed, such as the wildfires in Canada last year that amounted to six months of US fossil emissions. Two years before, we wrote a paper that found that Siberia also lost the same amount of carbon.”

People were surprised to find out the dire situation we might be in if the trees on our planet stop absorbing carbon.

With many taking to social media to share their concerns, one user on Reddit wrote: “Younger trees are incapable of sequestering as much carbon as older trees, which is why common bandaid solutions (e.g. planting more trees, adding more greenery) aren't surefire solutions in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

A second said: “At this point watching people be shocked by what is happening is just borderline amusing.”

And a third joked: “I mean maybe they’re frustrated and I’m like girl same.”

Choose your content:

8 hours ago
a day ago
2 days ago
  • ESA/DLR/FU Berlin
    8 hours ago

    ESA's new image of Mars shows stark contrast to NASA's iconic 1976 picture

    It indicates an alarming shift across just a few decades

    Science
  • Frederick York/Biodiversity Heritage Library via Wikimedia Commons
    a day ago

    Sad fate of the first extinct species to have its DNA examined known as the quagga

    The species went extinct in the late 19th Century

    Science
  • Lourdes Balduque / Getty
    a day ago

    All blue-eyed people can trace their ancestry back to a single individual

    They lived between 6,000 and 10,000 years ago

    Science
  • Jim WATSON/AFP via Getty Images
    2 days ago

    Major drugs classified as Schedule 1 as Trump reclassifies weed as less dangerous

    The decision was made by the Department of Justice last week

    Science
  • 99% of human population was wiped out 900,000 years ago with 1,000 people repopulating the Earth, study says
  • How much water ChatGPT's outage could have saved puts environmental impact of chatbot into horrifying perspective
  • Bizarre side effect of solar panels causes rainstorms in the driest place on Earth
  • Scientists issue eerie warning following discovery of mutant killer superbug trapped in 5,000–year–old ice