uniladtech homepage
  • News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Scientists reveal the 36 names least likely to get a job in shocking new study

Home> Science> News

Published 15:27 2 Sep 2025 GMT+1

Scientists reveal the 36 names least likely to get a job in shocking new study

Employers are taking first impressions to the extreme

Harry Boulton

Harry Boulton

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover
Featured Image Credit: Westend61 / Getty
Science

Advert

Advert

Advert

People always say that first impressions count during a job interview, but a shocking scientific study has revealed that employers can base your prospective success on your name alone, leaving many to wonder if that's the reason why they didn't get a call back.

Employers use a wide variety of different techniques to establish whether you're a right fit for the company, from strange coffee cup tricks to deceptively easy questions that have important answers.

However, it might not matter how well you do in the application or interview process if you've got a certain name, as a study conducted by scientists at Carleton University in Canada has revealed the shocking truth that many employers explicitly or unconsciously conform to.

Scientific studies have shown that your name might play a bigger role than expected in job application success rates (Getty Stock)
Scientific studies have shown that your name might play a bigger role than expected in job application success rates (Getty Stock)

What names are least likely to get a job?

As reported by the Daily Mail, here are the 36 names that are scientifically least likely to get a job:

  1. Rita
  2. Erica
  3. Etta
  4. Patty
  5. Christie
  6. Katie
  7. Kasey
  8. Petra
  9. Kathy
  10. Katia
  11. Kate
  12. Trista
  13. Tracy
  14. Pippa
  15. Tessa
  16. Tia
  17. Greta
  18. Yvette
  19. Eric
  20. Hector
  21. Chris
  22. Curtis
  23. Kirk
  24. Ted
  25. Titus
  26. Tucker
  27. Tate
  28. Terry
  29. Pierce
  30. Carter
  31. Kipp
  32. Kurt
  33. Jack
  34. Victor
  35. Garrett
  36. Zach

While it might just be a strange coincidence that the two biggest offenders are names featured in Lou Bega's Mambo No. 5, there are alarming consistencies throughout the list that suggest something is at play with the names themselves.

Advert

For example, nearly half of the top 11 names have the predominant 'Ka' sound, with four out of that five being variants of the name 'Kate' – which is also included.

Lead authors of the study, Dr David Sidhu and Professor Penny Pexman, have outlined in an article on The Conversation that this relates to theories of sound symbolism — particularly the 'bouba/kiki effect'.

This relates to the idea across most languages and cultures that people tend to match the made up word 'bouba' with round shapes and 'kiki' with spiky ones, and this extends to personality traits implicitly associated with certain names.

"Smoother-sounding names like Liam or Noelle were judged as more agreeable and emotional, while spikier-sounding names like Tate or Krista were judged as more extroverted," the authors explained.

What names are most likely to get a job?

Contrastingly, if you have any of these names then you might have a leg up on others when going for a job:

  1. Anne
  2. Joanna
  3. June
  4. Lanah
  5. Laurel
  6. Lauren
  7. Lois
  8. Luna
  9. Mara
  10. Marla
Anne is far more likely to be hired than Rita, for example, according to science and language analysis (Getty Stock)
Anne is far more likely to be hired than Rita, for example, according to science and language analysis (Getty Stock)

It's not a coincidence that these broadly trend more towards the 'bouba' side of things, with the sounds also leaning towards 'sonarant' consonants (l, m, n) as opposed to the more 'abrupt' voiceless stops of p, t, and k.

Something else that appears to play into things is the socio-demographic cues of certain names, which imply the race and age of the applicant and can become a serious ethical issue with bias.

  • Scientists reveal shocking reason Neanderthals never truly went extinct in new study
  • Scientists reveal terrifying number of people who could die by 2050 if we don't take climate change action
  • Eerie new study reveals how your 'AI twin' will apply for same job before you do
  • Scientists reveal location where you're most likely to develop unusual allergy to red meat

Choose your content:

2 hours ago
4 hours ago
23 hours ago
  • SCIEPRO/SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY / Getty
    2 hours ago

    Scientists discover bizarre thing that happens to semen in space

    Humanity's future beyond Earth might be compromised

    Science
  • Scott Olson/Getty Images
    4 hours ago

    Drug prescribed to millions over decades revealed to have unexpected impact on the brain

    It is prescribed to over 120 million people worldwide

    Science
  • Bloomberg / Contributor via Getty
    23 hours ago

    YouTuber tested how accurate the Apple Watch calorie calculator really is in mind-blowing experiment

    It's not what you might think...

    Science
  • Peter Dazeley / Contributor / Getty
    23 hours ago

    Health official issues warning over common vaping habit directly linked with meningitis outbreak

    Some have speculated that this has contributed to the significant spread

    Science