• News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Scientists finally discover whether the chicken or the egg came first

Home> Science> News

Published 09:35 4 Mar 2024 GMT

Scientists finally discover whether the chicken or the egg came first

Scientists have weighed in on the age-old question.

Prudence Wade

Prudence Wade

google discoverFollow us on Google Discover

It's a common question: what came first, the chicken or the egg?

You might have thrown the query about, thinking it's a riddle with no real answer.

But a scientist has revealed that yes, there actually is an answer to this age-old question - and it's pretty definitive.

fzant / Getty

Advert

"The egg definitely came first," Luis Villazon, a science and technology educator who trained as a zoologist, wrote in BBC Science Focus Magazine.

This is because "eggs are much older than chickens", he explained. "Dinosaurs laid eggs, the fish that first crawled out of the sea laid eggs, and the weird articulated monsters that swam in the warm shallow seas of the Cambrian Period 500 million years ago also laid eggs."

According to the New Scientist, eggs evolved over a billion years ago, while chickens haven't been around for quite as long - a mere 10,000 years.

So that pretty much puts that to bed - perhaps a better question would be something like: what came first, the chicken or the chicken's egg?

According to Villazon, that hinges on how you define a chicken's egg - an egg laid by a chicken, or an egg that a chicken hatches from.

Henry Arden / Getty

"At some point in evolutionary history when there were no chickens, two birds that were almost-but-not-quite chickens mated and laid an egg that hatched into the first chicken," he wrote in BBC Science Focus.

So the first chicken in existence was the result of two almost-chickens mating - likely the red junglefowl, which is native to Southeastern Asian countries.

"If you are prepared to call that egg a chicken’s egg, then the egg came first. Otherwise, the chicken came first and the first chicken’s egg had to wait until the first chicken laid it," Villazon added.

So there you have it - the timeless question has been somewhat cleared up, but at it's core it's still a matter of opinion.

Like whether the glass if half-full or half-empty, it depends on your perspective.

Featured Image Credit: Kinga Krzeminska/Catherine Falls Commercial/Getty
Science

Advert

Advert

Advert

Choose your content:

7 hours ago
a day ago
2 days ago
  • supplied via Tyla
    7 hours ago

    How woman born without a vagina discovered her condition at age 16

    Only 1 in 5,000 women are affected

    Science
  • Oleg Breslavtsev/Getty Images
    a day ago

    Getting exactly seven hours and 18 minutes sleep a night 'prevents' these 'two major health conditions'

    Too much sleep can be just as bad for your health as not getting enough, according to experts

    Science
  • Andrew Francis Wallace/Toronto Star via Getty Images
    2 days ago

    'Boil in the bag' funerals where liquified bodies are flushed down a drain come to major western country

    It's an alternative form of cremation

    Science
  • wildpixel / Getty
    2 days ago

    Scientists warn men are losing their Y chromosomes and it could turn deadly

    The risk appears to increase with age

    Science
  • Scientists discover horrifying find in human semen for the first time ever
  • Scientists make groundbreaking discovery about how water came into existence
  • Scientists discover life 'wriggling' inside 3,300,000,000 year-old-rock
  • Scientists discover groundbreaking new evidence that the Big Bang theory is wrong