• News
    • Tech News
    • AI
  • Gadgets
    • Apple
    • iPhone
  • Gaming
    • Playstation
    • Xbox
  • Science
    • News
    • Space
  • Streaming
    • Netflix
  • Vehicles
    • Car News
  • Social Media
    • WhatsApp
    • YouTube
  • Advertise
  • Terms
  • Privacy & Cookies
  • LADbible Group
  • LADbible
  • UNILAD
  • SPORTbible
  • GAMINGbible
  • Tyla
  • FOODbible
  • License Our Content
  • About Us & Contact
  • Jobs
  • Latest
  • Topics A-Z
  • Authors
Facebook
Instagram
X
TikTok
Snapchat
WhatsApp
Submit Your Content
Shocking reality of what airport security can actually see in X-Ray machine leaves passengers in disbelief

Home> News

Published 10:36 3 Nov 2025 GMT

Shocking reality of what airport security can actually see in X-Ray machine leaves passengers in disbelief

Critics dubbed the scanners as 'virtual strip searches'

Rebekah Jordan

Rebekah Jordan

Featured Image Credit: EvgeniyShkolenko via Getty
Travel

Advert

Advert

Advert

The shocking reality of what airport security can actually see in X-Ray machine leaves many passengers in disbelief.

Most travellers today have no idea just how invasive airport security scanners used to be. If you've only flown in recent years, you've been spared from one of the most controversial pieces of airport technology ever deployed.

In the early 2010s, the infamous Rapiscan X-ray scanners caused massive backlash due to the level of detail they revealed about passengers' bodies.

The technology was introduced by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in the United States following the 2009 Christmas Day bombing attempt.

Advert




Advert

At a staggering cost of $180,000 per machine, 174 of these scanners were installed across 30 airports throughout the US. The TSA justified the expense and intrusiveness as necessary for national security after the failed attack attempt.

Critics quickly dubbed the scanners 'virtual strip searches' and for good reason. The machines produced images that revealed everything from body shape to personal anatomy in shocking detail.

Essentially, security personnel could see the outline and contours of passengers' naked bodies, along with anything they might be hiding under their clothes.

Safe to say, social media has exploded, with shocked travellers sharing their disbelief over the invasive technology.

Advert

One commenter at the time wrote, "I'll just drive everywhere, thanks."

Another joked: "This is airport security, not OnlyFans."

Critics quickly dubbed the scanners 'virtual strip searches' and for good reason. (Ziga Plahutar/Getty)
Critics quickly dubbed the scanners 'virtual strip searches' and for good reason. (Ziga Plahutar/Getty)

The backlash reached a tipping point in 2013 when the TSA was forced to remove the controversial machines due to their inability to meet privacy standards.

Advert

In July of 2010, the Electronic Privacy Information Center sued the TSA, saying that the scanners violated privacy laws and that the imagery was equivalent to a 'physically invasive strip search.'

The Rapiscan scanners couldn't integrate Automated Target Recognition (ATR) software that would have created generic, less intrusive outlines of passengers' bodies.

Without the ability to anonymise the images and protect passenger privacy, the scanners had to go.

The Rapiscan machines were replaced with millimetre wave scanners, which are still in use at airports today.

Advert

Unlike their predecessors, these newer scanners don't reveal a passenger's unique body image. Instead, they rely on non-intrusive, generic outlines to flag potential threats.

For many travellers who missed this chapter in airport security history, discovering what the old Rapiscan scanners actually showed has come as a genuine shock.

"I thought X-ray meant you could only see bones," one stunned X user commented while another joked: "Guess I'll be tucking my junk text time, just in case."

Choose your content:

26 mins ago
an hour ago
2 hours ago
3 hours ago
  • SOPA Images / Contributor via Getty
    26 mins ago

    Google forced to remove AI model after it accused senator of sexual misconduct

    Google boss Sundar Pichai is in the firing line

    News
  • FoxNews/X
    an hour ago

    Erika Kirk breaks silence on if her husband's trial will be broadcast to the public

    Tyler Robinson stands accused of Charlie Kirk's murder

    News
  • Pool / Pool via Getty
    2 hours ago

    Erika Kirk breaks silence after hug with JD Vance goes viral

    The pair have set tongues wagging

    News
  • Tom Williams / Contributor / Getty
    3 hours ago

    Elon Musk issues $38,000,000,000,000 bankruptcy warning that could explode Bitcoin price

    Musk has expressed his worries about the US economy

    News
  • People shocked after passenger filmed as their phone went through X-ray scanner at airport
  • Millions affected by TSA rule change that bans certain card at airport security
  • Airport security expert reveals reason you should never use a padlock on your suitcase
  • Security expert explains alarming reason why you should never charge your phone at an airport